The output below tells us that U = 9, and the effect size is rrb = -0.81. This represents a very strong effect: looking at the mean ranks in the output above, we can see that life satisfaction was higher in those who had cats for a pet. We could report something like (note that I’ve quoted the mean ranks from the Descriptives table):
People who had a cat as a pet (mean R = 15.38) reported significantly higher life satisfaction that those whose pet was a fish (mean R = 7.25), U = 9, p = .003, rrb = −0.81 (95% CI [-0.93, -0.54]).